<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Flat Bulb</title> <atom:link href="http://www.gadgetvenue.com/flat-bulb-11070055/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.gadgetvenue.com/flat-bulb-11070055/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Chris at LG</title><link>http://www.gadgetvenue.com/flat-bulb-11070055/#comment-49094</link> <dc:creator>Chris at LG</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:21:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetvenue.com/?p=6873#comment-49094</guid> <description>Gorgeous design but isn&#039;t using old-fashioned bulbs a bit of a step backward? WHy not energy-saving ones?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gorgeous design but isn&#8217;t using old-fashioned bulbs a bit of a step backward? WHy not energy-saving ones?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 35/41 queries in 0.027 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 310/316 objects using memcached

Served from: www.gadgetvenue.com @ 2012-02-10 07:51:02 -->
